This architecture demonstrates efficient AI acceleration in edge devices with dynamic resource sharing and power savings.
This paper presents a dual-core RISC-V architecture designed for energy-efficient AI acceleration at the edge, featuring dynamic MAC unit sharing, frequency scaling (DFS), and FIFO-based resource arbitration. The system comprises two RISC-V cores that compete for shared computational resources—a single Multiply–Accumulate (MAC) unit and a shared external memory subsystem—governed by a channel-based arbitration mechanism with CPU-priority semantics, while each core maintains private instruction and data caches. The architecture implements a tightly coupled Neural Processing Unit (NPU) with CONV, GEMM, and POOL operations that execute opportunistically in the background when the MAC unit is available. Dynamic frequency scaling (DFS) with three levels (100/200/400 MHz) is applied to the shared MAC unit, allowing the dynamic acceleration of CNN workloads. The arbitration mechanism uses SystemC sc_fifo channels with CPU-priority polling, ensuring that CPU execution is minimally impacted by background AI processing while the NPU makes progress during idle MAC slots. The NPU supports 3 × 3 convolutions, matrix multiplication (GEMM) with 10 × 10 tiles, and pooling operations. The implementation is cycle-accurate in SystemC, targeting FPGA deployment. Experimental evaluation demonstrates that the dual-core architecture achieves 1.87× speedup with 93.5% efficiency for parallel workloads, while DFS enables 70% power reduction at low frequency. The system successfully executes simultaneous CPU and AI workloads, with CPU-priority arbitration ensuring no CPU starvation under contention. The proposed design offers a practical solution for embedded AI applications requiring both general-purpose computation and neural network acceleration, validated through comprehensive SystemC simulation on modern FPGA platforms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cristian Andy Tânase (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: