Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Benchmarking study demonstrates low-latency matrix multiplication on an FPGA-based RISC-V system-on-chip, suggesting an efficient hardware architecture for edge artificial intelligence inference.
Running deep-learning inference on constrained edge hardware calls for architectures that cut both latency and memory traffic at once—not one at the expense of the other. This paper describes a complete FPGA-validated RISC-V SoC in which a five-stage RV32IM processor works alongside a custom 4× 4 output-stationary systolic MAC array. An AXI4 crossbar ties the two parts together, and a scatter–gather DMA engine moves operand tiles and results so the processor stays free for control work during inference. Rather than adding custom opcodes, the accelerator is exposed through memory-mapped registers, which means existing RISC-V toolchains need no modification at all. The target device is the Xilinx Artix-7 XC7A35T on a Digilent Basys 3 board. Both Vivado XSim simulation and on-board runs confirm that a 4× 4 matrix multiply finishes in 320 ns at 100 MHz, giving a compute-phase throughput of 1.16 GOPS. The systolic compute phase completes in 3N-1 = 11 cycles (110 ns); the full end-to-end tile latency including AXI handshaking is 320 ns. After place-and-route the design uses 39.5% LUTs (8214 of 20,800), 17.8% DSP48E1 slices (16 of 90), and 16.0% BRAM (8 of 50) on the XC7A35T, with a total on-chip power of 148 mW and a compute-phase efficiency of 7.86 GOPS/W. The processing elements natively operate on INT8 quantised inputs sign-extended to 18 bits to match the DSP48E1’s narrower multiplier port, with 64-bit accumulators preventing overflow across a full tile. Two propositions are formally proved: the first establishes that the output-stationary schedule reduces computation cycles by Θ (N²/3) relative to a naïve, unblocked sequential CPU execution, and the second shows a factor- N reduction in weight-memory reads under the same naïve baseline assumption. The design is validated for functional correctness on physical silicon; power, DMA-overlap, and sustained-throughput figures are estimates derived from Vivado post-implementation analysis and the analytical performance model rather than direct on-board measurement. Among open RISC-V accelerator designs the proposed SoC stands out by combining plain Verilog source, operation on the lower-cost Artix-7 without any embedded ARM host, memory-mapped control that keeps the compiler unmodified, DMA-driven transfers, and a closed-form performance model that matches the measured numbers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kalagi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: