Key result
Epicardial LAPW mapping linked to ~3-fold higher bipolar voltages than endocardial mapping in persistent AF.
Observational (n=27)
Yes
Simultaneous mapping of the left atrial posterior wall during persistent atrial fibrillation reveals epicardial-to-endocardial voltage gradients and conduction block, suggesting a 3-dimensional arrhythmogenic substrate that may necessitate transmural ablation approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Endocardial mapping may underestimate posterior wall voltages in persistent AF; leaves open whether targeting epicardial substrate improves ablation outcomes.
Endocardial-epicardial LAPW asynchrony may be observed during human persistent AF and is characterized by: (1) greater epicardial compared with endocardial bipolar voltages, (2) more frequent epicardial-to-endocardial activation gradients during AF, and (3) conduction block commonly seen between the epicardial and endocardial surfaces during AF. Although the study was predominantly descriptive in nature, the observations suggest a dynamic 3-dimensional arrhythmogenicity of the LAPW and the potential importance of the epicardial layer, with implications for ablation therapies. Future prospective studies are required to determine the significance of these findings to clinical ablation outcomes.
Wong et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=27). High-density epicardial mapping vs. Endocardial mapping was evaluated on Bipolar voltage at the mid-posterior wall during atrial fibrillation (p=0.005). Epicardial mapping of the left atrial posterior wall during persistent atrial fibrillation demonstrated significantly greater bipolar voltages compared with endocardial mapping (0.73 vs 0.23 mV, p=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: