Why the study?
With expanding indications and ongoing technical developments, the question arises whether the S-ICD should become the first choice for the majority of primary and secondary prevention patients.
Design
Narrative review
Authors
Loading...
Supports S-ICD consideration in select patients without pacing needs; leaves open need for randomized comparative data.
The S-ICD is an established alternative to transvenous ICDs for sudden cardiac death prevention, particularly in patients without pacing needs or with complex anatomy/venous access issues.
Kaya et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: