Population
Patients at risk for sudden cardiac death who are not expected to require pacing due to bradycardia or…
Comparison
Entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter… vs Conventional transvenous implantable…
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Supports S-ICD consideration where pacing is unnecessary; leaves open randomized trials to confirm long-term outcomes.
The S-ICD is a viable alternative to transvenous ICDs for preventing sudden cardiac death in patients who do not require pacing, offering reduced lead-related complications despite some device-specific limitations.
Bettin et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: