Why the study?
How accurate is three-dimensional PC-MRI for quantifying viscous and turbulent losses in stenotic aortic flow at clinical spatial resolutions?
How accurate is three-dimensional PC-MRI for quantifying viscous and turbulent losses in stenotic aortic flow at clinical spatial resolutions?
In clinical 3D PC-MRI, turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) is a more robust and accurate measure of energy loss in stenotic aortic flow compared to viscous loss, which is significantly underestimated.
At spatial resolutions feasible in clinical three-dimensional PC-MRI measurements, viscous losses of stenotic flows are significantly underestimated, whereas TKE shows smaller errors and reduced sensitivity to spatial resolution. Magn Reson Med 76:191-196, 2016.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Binter et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: