Why the study?
Does a low prognostic nutritional index (PNI < 45) predict mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
Does a low prognostic nutritional index (PNI < 45) predict mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI?
A low prognostic nutritional index is a significant independent predictor of both in-hospital and long-term mortality in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI, offering a simple tool for risk stratification.
Low PNI associated with higher STEMI mortality; supports risk stratification but leaves open prospective validation and interventions.
We aimed to investigate whether the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), a combined nutritional-inflammatory score based on serum albumin levels and lymphocyte count, was associated with mortality in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). From September 2011 to November 2014, 309 consecutive patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI were prospectively enrolled. Patients with a combined score of albumin (g/L) + 5 × total lymphocyte count × 10⁹/L ≥ 45 or <45 were assigned a PNI score of 0 or 1, respectively. Of the 309 STEMI patients, 24 (7.74%) died in the hospital, and 15 (4.83%) died during long-term follow-up (median follow-up time, 19.5 [3-36] months). Compared to patients with a PNI of 0, patients with a PNI of 1 had significantly higher in-hospital (14.2% vs. 3.7%; P < 0.001) and long-term follow-up (21.7% vs. 6.9%, P < 0.001) mortality rates. PNI (1/0, HR, 2.414; 95% CI, 1.016 to 5.736; P = 0.046) was a significant independent predictor of mortality in patients with STEMI undergoing pPCI. Moreover, cumulative survival was significantly lower for patients with a PNI of 1 compared to patients with a PNI of 0 (78.3% vs. 93.1%, log-rank P < 0.001). PNI appears useful for the risk stratification of STEMI patients undergoing pPCI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: