Why the study?
Is a standardized minimalist approach for transfemoral TAVR using the SAPIEN 3 device safe and feasible in patients requiring aortic valve replacement?
Is a standardized minimalist approach for transfemoral TAVR using the SAPIEN 3 device safe and feasible in patients requiring aortic valve replacement?
A standardized minimalist approach for transfemoral TAVR using the SAPIEN 3 device demonstrates high device success and low 30-day mortality and complication rates.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports minimalist TAVR feasibility in selected patients; leaves open whether outcomes improve versus standard protocols in randomized trials.
BackgroundTo describe our updated minimalist approach (MA) for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TF-TAVR) using the SAPIEN 3 device and its evolution, as well as associated safety and efficacy parameters from a large cohort of patients.MethodsA stepwise description of the MA technique for TAVR for 300 consecutive patients was detailed. Safety and efficacy parameters were assessed using the VARC-2 criteria at the in-hospital and 30-days follow-up.ResultsA total of 300 consecutive patients (80 ± 7 years; median Logistic EuroSCORE of 11.4% [7.5–17.8]) between January 2014 and May 2016 were evaluated. TF-TAVR was performed under conscious sedation in 247 (82%) patients. Device success was achieved in 286 (95.6%) patients, and intended prosthesis performance in 289 (96.3%) patients. Significant paravalvular leak (PVL) graded more than mild was noted in 7 (2%) patients. No patient had severe PVL. All-cause mortality was noted in one (0.3%) patient in-hospital and in 2 (0.7%) patients at the 30-days follow-up. Major stroke occurred in 4 (1.3%) patients. 9 (3%) patients had major vascular complications at 30-days follow up. MACCE (VARC-2 criteria) were observed in 21 (7%) in-hospital and 25 (8.3%) at 30 days. A new permanent pacemaker implantation was required in 29 (10.7%) patients, and was reduced from 18% to 5.6% (p = 0.001) in a subgroup analysis considering higher implantation position of the valve after the first year of experience.ConclusionMA of TF-TAVR, when simplified and standardized, is reproducible, safe and efficient, and should be encouraged to be accepted as the standard method of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frangieh et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: