Comparison of estimated and modified shunt equations shows they reasonably estimate Qs/Qt in critical patients, suggesting their potential in clinical settings.
Because the classic shunt equation requires mixed-venous blood gas values, an estimated and a modified equation have been suggested for use when mixed-venous blood is not available. Both these equations assume an arterial-venous oxygen content difference of 3.5 vol%-and the modified shunt equation also assumes a PaO2 of ⩾ 100 torr. We compared the three equations in 13 critically ill patients. Method: All patients had a pulmonary artery catheter and were hemodynamically stable. The classic and estimated shunt equations were used to calculate shunt (Qs/Qt) simultaneously for all data (n = 57). When PaO2 was ⩾ 100 torr, the classic and modified equations were used simultaneously (n = 42). Results: Qs/Qt from the classic shunt equation may be from 6.3 percentage points (units) greater than to 3.3 units less than Qs/Qt from the estimated shunt equation. Qs/Qt from the classic equation may be from 6 units greater than to 4.8 units less than Qs/Qt from the modified equation. Conclusions: The estimated and modified shunt equations provide a reasonable estimate of Qs/Qt in hemody-namically stable patients. However, they should not be used when the arterial-venous content differs significantly from 3.5 vol%, in hemodynamically unstable patients, and when an accurate and precise intrapulmonary shunt value is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hess et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: