Key result
Higher QRS Index strongly predicts response to CRT.
Why the study?
Up to 30–50% of heart failure patients with reduced LVEF and a wide QRS complex fail to respond to CRT, and the role of the QRS Index as a predictor of response needed systematic evaluation.
Is the QRS Index significantly higher in responders compared to non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,274)
Is the QRS Index significantly higher in responders compared to non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
The QRS Index, which quantifies QRS shortening after CRT, is significantly higher in CRT responders and may serve as a useful predictor of response.
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a wide QRS complex. However, up to 30–50% of patients fail to respond. The QRS Index, which quantifies QRS shortening after CRT, has emerged as a potential predictor of response. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the association between QRS Index and CRT response. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane for studies reporting QRS Index values in CRT responders and non-responders. Studies defining response based on clinical, echocardiographic, or combined criteria were included. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic, and a random-effects model was applied. A meta-regression analysis explored the relationship between baseline echocardiographic parameters and QRS Index. Results: Nine studies with 1274 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 760 (59%) classified as responders and 514 (41%) as non-responders. The weighted mean ± standard deviation was 16.14 ± 13.19 in responders and 7.22 ± 14.96 in non-responders. The QRS Index was significantly higher in the responder group compared to non-responders (mean difference: 8.76; 95% CI: 6.45–11.06; I2 = 45%; p < 0.00001). Meta-regression revealed that lower left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) values were associated with even higher QRS Index in responders compared to non-responders (β = −0.0483; 95% CI: −0.0938; −0.0029, p = 0.0372). Conclusions: QRS Index is significantly higher in CRT responders, supporting its role as a predictor of response. Further studies are needed to standardize its clinical use and assess its prognostic impact.
Corrado et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and a wide QRS complex undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (n=1,274). QRS Index vs. Non-responders was evaluated on QRS Index values in CRT responders versus non-responders (Mean difference 8.76, 95% CI 6.45-11.06, p=< 0.00001). The QRS Index was significantly higher in CRT responders compared to non-responders (mean difference 8.76; 95% CI 6.45-11.06; p<0.00001), supporting its role as a predictor of CRT response.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: