Why the study?
Limited real-world data exist regarding the advantages and complications associated with left bundle branch pacing as an alternative conduction system pacing modality.
What are the success rates and complications associated with left bundle branch pacing in patients requiring permanent pacemakers or cardiac resynchronization therapy?
What are the success rates and complications associated with left bundle branch pacing in patients requiring permanent pacemakers or cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Left bundle branch pacing is highly successful and improves LVEF in cardiomyopathy patients, but carries a notable 12.3% rate of lead-related complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Supports LBBP feasibility in pacemaker/CRT candidates; leaves open long-term safety questions given 12.3% complications in this cohort.
Ravi et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: