PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2015Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions59 citationsOpen Access

Association of Patient-Reported Health Status With Long-Term Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

View Full Paper
Suzanne V. Arnold
Suzanne V. ArnoldInterventional / Structural Cardiology
John A. Spertus
John A. SpertusCross-Cutting Cardiology
Sreekanth Vemulapalli
Sreekanth VemulapalliCardiac Imaging

Structured PICO

Does worse preprocedure patient-reported health status (assessed by KCCQ) predict increased 1-year mortality in patients undergoing TAVR?

P
Population
7,769 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) from 286 sites in the STS/ACC TVT Registry
I
Intervention
Worse preprocedure health status as assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ Overall Summary Score <75, categorized as very poor <25, poor 25-49, or fair 50-74)
C
Comparator
Good preprocedure health status (KCCQ Overall Summary Score ≥75)
O
Outcome
1-year mortality after TAVRhard clinical

Worse preprocedure patient-reported health status, as measured by the KCCQ, is strongly and independently associated with increased 1-year mortality after TAVR.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an effective treatment for aortic stenosis, long-term mortality after TAVR remains high and challenging to predict. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a health status measure, assessed directly from patients, that integrates 2 clinically relevant factors (symptoms and functional status) that may predict TAVR outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 7769 patients from 286 sites in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) Registry, we examined the association between preprocedure (baseline) patient health status, as assessed by the KCCQ, and 1-year mortality after TAVR. The KCCQ Overall Summary Score was categorized as very poor: <25, poor: 25 to 49, fair: 50 to 74, or good: ≥75. Before TAVR, health status was rated as very poor in 28%, poor in 38%, fair in 24%, and good in 10%. Patients with worse health status were more likely to be women and had more comorbidities and higher STS mortality risk scores. Compared with those with good health status before TAVR and after adjusting for a broad range of baseline covariates, patients with very poor health status had a 2-fold increased hazard of death over the first year after TAVR (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.58-2.54), whereas those with poor and fair health status had intermediate outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.95 and adjusted hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.55, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In a national, contemporary practice cohort, worse preprocedure patient health status, as assessed by the KCCQ, was associated with greater long-term mortality after TAVR. These results support the measurement and integration of the KCCQ into mortality risk assessments for patients considering TAVR.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Arnold et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f29c871b51e2fbf01870ffhttps://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.115.002875
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper