Why the study?
The dynamic nature of BNP and NT-proBNP in response to HF therapy led to the concept of biomarker-guided care, but guideline recommendations vary while awaiting emerging clinical trial data.
Does natriuretic peptide-guided heart failure management improve outcomes and achievement of guideline-directed medical therapy goals in patients with heart failure?
Does natriuretic peptide-guided heart failure management improve outcomes and achievement of guideline-directed medical therapy goals in patients with heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“There are several differences in the statements among HF Societies regarding the use of natriuretic peptides as biomarkers for risk stratification and prevention. The scientific statement provides up-to-date perspectives and guidance that healthcare professionals can use to navigate and provide the best care for their patients with HF.”
“GUIDE-IT, the largest trial of its kind to date, failed to demonstrate any meaningful advantage to a biomarker-guided management.”
“Because of the absence of clear and consistent evidence for improvement in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes at present there are insufficient data to inform specific guideline recommendations related to natriuretic peptide–guided therapy or serial measurements of BNP or NT-proBNP levels for the purpose of reducing hospitalization or deaths.”
Natriuretic peptide-guided heart failure management is a promising strategy to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy and potentially improve outcomes, currently holding a Class IIa/IIb recommendation in US guidelines.
The natriuretic peptides are important tools to establish diagnosis and prognosis in heart failure (HF). With application of therapies for HF, changes in both B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and its amino terminal cleavage fragment (NT-proBNP) parallel the benefits of the HF therapy applied. This dynamic nature of BNP and NT-proBNP relative to therapeutic intervention in HF has led to the concept of using the biomarkers as a 'guide' for intensification of HF care with a goal of not only achieving guideline-directed medical therapy goals accompanied by targeted natriuretic peptide suppression below prognostic thresholds. In studies achieving this combination of therapy optimization and BNP/NT-proBNP suppression, superior outcomes have been observed, and the approach was well tolerated. Natriuretic peptide-guided HF therapy has recently been given a recommendation in US HF guidelines to achieve guideline-directed medical therapy (Class IIa) and possibly improve outcome (Class IIb), while other clinical practice guidelines (including those from the European Society of Cardiology) await results from emerging clinical trial data. We will review lessons learned in the past regarding this novel concept of biomarker guided HF care, and discuss future directions for the approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Troughton et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: