Why the study?
Contemporary imaging modalities revealed that plaque progression and regression do not correlate closely with luminal size due to arterial remodeling.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Angiography may underestimate plaque burden despite preserved lumen; leaves open intravascular imaging to define remodeling's prognostic role.
Traditionally, the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) was described as a gradual growth of plaques within the intima of the vessel. The outer boundaries of the intima, the media and the external elastic membrane (EEM), were thought to be fixed in size. In this model plaque growth would always lead to luminal narrowing and the number and severity of angiographic stenoses would reflect the extent of coronary disease. However, histologic studies demonstrated that certain plaques do not reduce luminal size, presumably because of expansion of the media and EEM during atheroma development. This phenomenon of "arterial remodeling" was confirmed in necropsy specimens of human coronary arteries. More recently, the development of contemporary imaging technology, particularly intravascular ultrasound, has allowed the study of arterial remodeling in vivo. These new imaging modalities have confirmed that plaque progression and regression are not closely related to luminal size. In this review, we will analyze the role of remodeling in the progression and regression of native CAD, as well as its impact on restenosis after coronary intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schoenhagen et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: