PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 6, 2017European Journal of Heart Failure218 citations

Recovered Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and Outcomes: A Prospective Study

View Full Paper
JLJosep LupónCDCarles Díez‐LópezMAMarta de Antonio

Structured PICO

Does recovered ejection fraction improve outcomes compared to persistent HFrEF or HFpEF in patients with heart failure?

P
Population
1057 consecutive heart failure patients, classified into HF-recovered (n=233), HFpEF (n=117), and HFrEF (n=707).
I
Intervention
HF-recovered status (LVEF <45% at baseline and ≥45% at 1 year)
C
Comparator
HFpEF (LVEF ≥45% throughout follow-up) and HFrEF (LVEF <45% throughout follow-up)
O
Outcome
Composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalizationcomposite

Patients with recovered HFrEF experience significantly improved mortality and morbidity compared to those with persistent HFrEF or HFpEF.

Abstract

AIMS: Significant recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) occurs in a proportion of patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We analysed outcomes, including mortality all-cause, cardiovascular (CV), HF-related, and sudden death, and HF-related hospitalizations in this HF-recovered group. The primary endpoint was a composite of CV death or HF hospitalization. METHODS AND RESULTS: LVEF was assessed at baseline and at 1 year in 1057 consecutive HF patients. Patients were classified into three groups: (i) HF-recovered: LVEF <45% at baseline and ≥45% at 1 year (n = 233); (ii) HF with preserved EF (HFpEF): LVEF ≥45% throughout follow-up (n = 117); and (iii) HFrEF: LVEF <45% throughout follow-up (n = 707). Mean follow-up was 5.6 ± 3.1 years. HF-recovered patients differed from HFrEF and HFpEF groups in demographic and clinical characteristics. The mean LVEF increase was 21.1 ± 10 points in HF-recovered patients. Using the HF-recovered group as a reference, the risks for the primary composite endpoint (n = 376), with non-CV death as competing risk, for HFpEF and HFrEF groups were: hazard ratio (HR) 2.33 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.60-3.39, P < 0.001 and HR 1.99 (95% CI 1.50-2.65), P < 0.001, respectively. All-cause (n = 429), CV (n = 245), HF-related (n = 127), and sudden death (n = 60) were significantly lower in HF-recovered subjects relative to HFrEF (all P < 0.01). HF-recovered patients also experienced less recurrent HF hospitalizations (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: One in four treated patients with HFrEF showed recovery of systolic function. HF-recovered patients had significantly improved mortality and morbidity relative to HFpEF and HFrEF subjects. Further research is needed to identify optimal medications and device indications for HF-recovered patients.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Lupón et al. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f935308338827971878c15https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.824
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper