Why the study?
How do spironolactone and eplerenone compare in terms of pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and adverse effects for patients with hypertension or heart failure?
How do spironolactone and eplerenone compare in terms of pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and adverse effects for patients with hypertension or heart failure?
This review provides guidance on selecting between spironolactone and eplerenone for patients with heart failure or hypertension based on individual patient characteristics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May guide personalized MRA selection in HF or hypertension; leaves open need for head-to-head RCTs.
Clinical trials have demonstrated morbidity and mortality benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in patients with heart failure. These studies have used either spironolactone or eplerenone as the MRA. It is generally believed that these two agents have the same effects, and the data from studies using one drug could be extrapolated for the other. National and international guidelines do not generally discriminate between spironolactone and eplerenone, but strongly recommend using an MRA for patients with heart failure due to LV systolic dysfunction and post-infarct LV systolic dysfunction. There are no major clinical trials directly comparing the efficacy of these two drugs. This article aims to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of spironolactone and eplerenone, and to analyse the available data for their cardiovascular indications and adverse effects. We have also addressed the role of special circumstances including co-morbidities, concomitant drug therapy, cost, and licensing restrictions in choosing an appropriate MRA for a particular patient, thus combining an evidence-based approach with personalized medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iqbal et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: