Why the study?
Changes in TR, MR, and LVEF frequently occur after conventional pacemaker implantation, but data evaluating whether LBBA or leadless pacemakers modify these changes are limited.
Does left bundle branch area or leadless pacemaker implantation prevent worsening of valvular and ventricular function compared to conventional right ventricular pacemakers in patients requiring first-time pacemaker implantation?
Does left bundle branch area or leadless pacemaker implantation prevent worsening of valvular and ventricular function compared to conventional right ventricular pacemakers in patients requiring first-time pacemaker implantation?
Left bundle branch area pacing is associated with more favorable changes in valvular and ventricular function compared to conventional right ventricular and leadless pacemakers.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change device selection; leaves open whether LBBA pacing improves outcomes versus RV or leadless options in randomized trials.
Introduction Changes in tricuspid regurgitation (TR), mitral regurgitation (MR) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are frequently noted after conventional pacemaker implantation but prior studies evaluating whether left bundle branch area (LBBA) or leadless pacemakers modify those observed changes are limited. This study aims to compare changes in TR, MR and LVEF after implantation of conventional right ventricular (RV), leadless, and LBBA pacemakers. Methods Inclusion criteria were first-time pacemaker implantation and pre- and post-implant echocardiography. Change in TR, MR and LVEF were analyzed using post-hoc adjusted Kruskal-Wallis and chi-squared testing, and multivariable ordinal logistic regression. Results Among 400 consecutive patients (RV, n=228; LBBA, n=136; leadless, n=36), the change in TR grade differed between pacemaker types (median [interquartile range] grade change: LBBA 0[0,0], leadless 0[0,1], RV 0[0,1]; p<0.01). The prevalence of severe TR was similar between pacemaker groups before implant (p=0.93), but more frequent following implant of RV and leadless pacemakers compared to LBBA pacemakers (p=0.02). In multivariable ordinal logistic regression, leadless (OR 2.26, p=0.03) and RV pacemakers (OR 1.66, p=0.03) both predicted TR worsening compared to LBBA. The change in MR grade differed between pacemaker types (grade change: LBBA 0[-1,0], leadless 0[0,1], RV 0[0,0]; p<0.01). The change in LVEF differed between pacemaker types (LVEF change: LBBA 0[- 5,7]%, leadless -5[-14,1]%, RV -3[-9,2]%; p<0.01). Conclusion Change in TR, MR grade and LVEF following pacemaker implant varied by pacemaker type. Compared to leadless and RV, LBBA pacemaker implant was associated with more favorable changes in valvular and ventricular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: