Key result
Leadless pacemakers linked to ~65% higher worsening TR risk vs transvenous pacemakers, driven by AV dyssynchrony.
Why the study?
Predictors of worsening atrioventricular valve regurgitation and LV systolic function after leadless pacemaker implantation remain unclear compared with transvenous pacemakers.
Does leadless pacemaker implantation worsen atrioventricular valve regurgitation and left ventricular systolic function compared to transvenous pacemaker implantation in patients requiring permanent pacemakers?
Cohort (n=205)
Does leadless pacemaker implantation worsen atrioventricular valve regurgitation and left ventricular systolic function compared to transvenous pacemaker implantation in patients requiring permanent pacemakers?
Worsening of atrioventricular valve regurgitation and LV systolic function after pacemaker implantation is driven by loss of AV synchrony and RV pacing burden rather than the type of pacemaker (leadless vs. transvenous).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Worsening tricuspid regurgitation after leadless pacemaker implantation should not yet alter device selection; supports AV synchrony preservation as the key driver in future studies.
BACKGROUND: Predictors of worsening atrioventricular valve regurgitation and left ventricular (LV) systolic function after implantation of a leadless pacemaker (LPM) remain unclear compared with those of a transvenous pacemaker (TPM). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 205 patients who were newly implanted with a permanent pacemaker (119 LPMs and 86 TPMs) and underwent transthoracic echocardiography before and 8 ± 5 months after implantation. We evaluated the worsening of tricuspid and mitral regurgitation (TR and MR), defined as at least one-grade aggravation in severity, and changes in LV ejection fraction (LVEF). RESULTS: Worsening TR occurred more frequently in the LPM group compared to the TPM group (33% vs. 20%, p = .04); however, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding worsening MR (26% vs. 18%, p = .18) and LVEF change (-2 ± 10% vs. -3 ± 8%, p = .40). In multivariable analysis, independent predictors for worsening TR, MR, and LVEF after implantation were found to be (1) the change from sinus rhythm at baseline to atrioventricular asynchronous right ventricular (RV) pacing (odds ratio [OR]: 5.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.94-16.70, p < .01); (2) the change from non-pacing ventricular contraction at baseline to RV pacing (OR: 2.42, 95% CI: 1.12-5.24, p = .02); and (3) a higher RV pacing burden (β: -0.05, 95% CI: -0.08--0.02, p < .01), respectively. CONCLUSION: Worsening TR, MR, and LVEF after pacemaker implantation were not associated with the type of pacing device but loss of atrioventricular synchrony or dependency on RV pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasaki et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Newly implanted with a permanent pacemaker (n=205). Leadless pacemaker (LPM) vs. Transvenous pacemaker (TPM) was evaluated on Worsening of tricuspid regurgitation (p=0.04). Leadless pacemakers were associated with more frequent worsening of tricuspid regurgitation than transvenous pacemakers, though this was driven by loss of AV synchrony.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: