Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Descriptive summary of challenges and opportunities in pediatric device development for clinicians and innovators.
On July 9, 2025, the Midwest Pediatric Device Consortium hosted its second showcase at the MidTown Collaboration Center in Cleveland, OH. This meeting convened clinicians, engineers, regulators, entrepreneurs, and policy stakeholders to discuss the challenges and opportunities in pediatric medical device development. The program included expert panel discussions addressing value demonstration in healthcare, data-driven post market surveillance, cybersecurity risk and data protection, artificial intelligence, clinical algorithms, and pediatric-specific considerations. This culminated in a pitch competition focused on Software as a Medical Device. This manuscript provides a descriptive summary of the meeting proceedings and synthesizes themes that emerged from panel discussions. The themes underscored the persistent structural barriers in pediatric device development, including alignment of value across stakeholders, limitations of real-world evidence infrastructure, data security challenges, and complexities in artificial intelligence driven technologies. These proceedings are intended to inform clinicians, innovators, and policymakers engaged in pediatric medical device development rather than serve as a formal program evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Echelmeyer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: