Why the study?
CAD frequently coexists with severe AS in patients undergoing TAVI, posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges that require personalized management as TAVI expands to younger, lower-risk patients.
Routine PCI before TAVI is increasingly scrutinized, with current evidence supporting a selective approach and the emerging use of coronary CTA to reduce unnecessary invasive procedures.
Requires personalized CAD strategies in younger TAVI patients; leaves open optimal assessment and revascularization protocols.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) often coexists with severe aortic stenosis (AS) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), posing a complex diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. As TAVI is increasingly used for younger, lower-risk patients, managing CAD is becoming a personalized, long-term clinical concern. This narrative review summarizes the current evidence on coronary assessment and revascularization strategies in individuals with severe AS. Invasive coronary angiography remains the leading method for anatomical coronary imaging, but coronary computed tomography angiography is emerging as a reliable alternative that may reduce unnecessary invasive procedures in certain patients. The routine performance of PCI before TAVI is under increasing scrutiny, and available data support a more selective approach based on lesion significance, CAD complexity, procedural timing, and anticipated need for future coronary access. Significant uncertainties remain concerning the physiological evaluation of lesions, the timing and completeness of revascularization, and the treatment of left main or multivessel disease. Additional phenotype-specific and longitudinal studies are needed to improve management algorithms for this population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sobczyk et al. (2026) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease and severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Coronary assessment and revascularization strategies was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: