Key result
Routine PCI provides no prognostic benefit in stable CAD patients undergoing TAVI.
Why the study?
Coronary artery disease is highly prevalent in severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI, but optimal PCI practices, prognostic impact, and revascularization timing remain uncertain.
This review highlights the diagnostic and technical challenges of managing complex coronary artery disease in patients undergoing TAVI, emphasizing the importance of individualized Heart Team decisions.
May support individualized decisions over routine PCI in TAVI patients with stable CAD; leaves open need for dedicated RCTs.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is highly prevalent in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). The management of CAD is a central aspect of the work-up of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), but few data are available on this field and the best percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice is yet to be determined. A major challenge is the ability to elucidate the severity of bystander coronary stenosis independently of the severity of aortic valve stenosis and subsequent impact on blood flow. The prognostic role of CAD in patients undergoing TAVI is being still debated and the benefits and the best timing of PCI in this context are currently under evaluation. Additionally, PCI in the setting of advanced AS poses some technical challenges, due to the complex anatomy, risk of hemodynamic instability, and the increased risk of bleeding complications. This review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the available literature on myocardial revascularization in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI. This work can assist the Heart Team in individualizing decisions about myocardial revascularization, taking into account available diagnostic tools as well as the risks and benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marin et al. (2021) conducted a review in Severe aortic stenosis and concomitant coronary artery disease. Myocardial revascularization (PCI) and physiological assessment vs. Conservative management or angiography-guided revascularization was evaluated. Routine percutaneous coronary intervention for stable coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation lacks prognostic benefit, requiring individualized decisions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: