Key result
LBBP achieves ~91% procedural success and stable pacing parameters following prosthetic cardiac valve surgery.
Why the study?
Does permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) provide feasible and safe pacing in patients with conduction disorders following prosthetic cardiac valves?
Observational (n=22)
No
Does permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) provide feasible and safe pacing in patients with conduction disorders following prosthetic cardiac valves?
Permanent LBBP is a feasible and safe pacing strategy with stable parameters for patients developing AV conduction disorders after prosthetic valve surgery.
LBBP appears feasible post-valve surgery; leaves open randomized trials to guide adoption.
Permanent LBBP could be feasibly and safely obtained in the majority of patients with PVs. The location of the PV might serve as a landmark for guiding the final site of the LBBP. Stable pacing parameters were observed during the follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Atrioventricular conduction diseases following prosthetic cardiac valves (n=22). Permanent Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) was evaluated on Procedural success of LBBP. Permanent left bundle branch pacing was successfully achieved in 90.9% of patients with conduction disorders following prosthetic cardiac valve surgery, maintaining stable pacing parameters over 16.1 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: