Key result
Noninvasive assessment using ultrasound and tonometry revealed higher energy dissipation ratios in subjects with cardiovascular risk or atherosclerosis (10%-20%) compared to healthy subjects (2%-6%).
Why the study?
Accurate assessment of arterial wall mechanics is essential for detecting vascular pathologies.
Does noninvasive assessment using ultrasound and tonometry detect differences in mechanical and viscoelastic properties of the common carotid artery between healthy subjects and those with cardiovascular risk or atherosclerosis?
Cross-Sectional
Does noninvasive assessment using ultrasound and tonometry detect differences in mechanical and viscoelastic properties of the common carotid artery between healthy subjects and those with cardiovascular risk or atherosclerosis?
A noninvasive technique combining ultrasound and tonometry can quantify arterial viscoelasticity, demonstrating higher energy dissipation ratios in patients with cardiovascular risk or atherosclerosis compared to healthy subjects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support noninvasive carotid stiffness monitoring; leaves open prospective validation against clinical outcomes.
Accurate assessment of arterial wall mechanics is essential for detecting vascular pathologies. The technique described herein incorporates a commercially available ultrasound system and applanation tonometry to noninvasively evaluate the local mechanical properties of the common carotid artery (CCA). Pressure waveforms were acquired using a tonometer combined with ultrasound-based diameter of the CCA. The signals were temporally aligned, converted to physical units using brachial systolic and diastolic pressure, and interpolated over uniform strain increments. Hoop stress was estimated using thick-wall assumptions, and hoop strain was derived from mid-wall circumferential stretch. Incremental elastic modulus was computed from local linear fits to the stress–strain data, and the area of the resulting hysteresis loop was used as a surrogate for viscoelastic energy loss, quantified by the energy dissipation ratio (EDR). The method was applied to healthy subjects (HS) and those with cardiovascular risk or confirmed atherosclerosis. In HS, pressure–strain elastic modulus (Ep) ranged from 50–55 kPa and EDR from 2%–6%, while non-healthy subjects showed higher EDR values (10%–20%), reflecting increased arterial viscoelasticity. Results revealed nonlinear pressure–diameter relationships with clear hysteresis, reflecting viscoelastic effects. The technique offers potential as a diagnostic tool for evaluating early, localized vascular alterations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aktharuzzaman et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk or confirmed atherosclerosis. Ultrasound and applanation tonometry vs. Healthy subjects was evaluated on Energy dissipation ratio (EDR) and pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep). Noninvasive assessment using ultrasound and tonometry revealed higher energy dissipation ratios in subjects with cardiovascular risk or atherosclerosis (10%-20%) compared to healthy subjects (2%-6%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: