Key result
High CVD risk linked to ~9% lower antihypertensive prescribing among hypertensive patients versus low-risk counterparts.
Why the study?
Hypertension guidelines recommend absolute CVD risk guide management, but data availability to calculate CVD risk and its association with antihypertensive prescribing were unclear.
Cross-Sectional (n=571,492)
Yes
Absolute Event Rate: 57.4% vs 63.3%
In Australian primary care, absolute CVD risk calculation is only possible in half of hypertensive patients, and antihypertensive prescribing is not adequately guided by absolute CVD risk, highlighting suboptimal guideline adherence.
Lower prescribing in high CVD-risk patients signals guideline gaps; hypothesis-generating for interventions improving risk documentation and adherence.
Hypertension guidelines recommend that absolute cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk guide the management of hypertensive patients. This study aimed to assess the proportion of patients with diagnosed hypertension with sufficient data to calculate absolute CVD risk and determine whether CVD risk is associated with prescribing of antihypertensive therapies. This was a cross-sectional study using a large national database of electronic medical records of patients attending general practice in 2018 (MedicineInsight). Of 571,492 patients aged 45-74 years without a history of CVD, 251,733 [40.6% (95% CI: 39.8-41.2)] had a recorded hypertension diagnosis. The proportion of patients with sufficient recorded data available to calculate CVD risk was higher for patients diagnosed with hypertension [51.0% (95% CI: 48.0-53.9)] than for patients without a diagnosis of hypertension [38.7% (95% CI: 36.5-41.0)]. Of those patients with sufficient data to calculate CVD risk, 29.3% (95% CI: 28.1-30.6) were at high risk clinically, 6.0% (95% CI: 5.8-6.3) were at high risk based on their CVD risk score, 12.8% (95% CI: 12.5-13.2) at moderate risk and 51.8% (95% CI: 50.8-52.9) at low risk. The overall prevalence of antihypertensive therapy was 60.9% (95% CI: 59.3-62.5). Prescribing was slightly lower in patients at high risk based on their CVD risk score [57.4% (95% CI: 55.4-59.4)] compared with those at low [63.3% (95% CI: 61.9-64.8)] or moderate risk [61.8% (95% CI: 60.2-63.4)] or at high risk clinically [64.1% (95% CI: 61.9-66.3)]. Guideline adherence is suboptimal, and many patients miss out on treatments that may prevent future CVD events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roseleur et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypertension (n=571,492). Antihypertensive therapy vs. Low CVD risk was evaluated on Prescribing of antihypertensive therapy. Antihypertensive therapy prescribing was lower among hypertensive patients at high calculated CVD risk (57.4%) compared to those at low risk (63.3%), indicating suboptimal guideline adherence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: