Key result
Comprehensive review outlines frequency, predictors, and potential solutions for access site complications after TAVR.
Why the study?
What are the frequency, outcomes, predictors, and treatments for access site complications in patients undergoing TAVR?
What are the frequency, outcomes, predictors, and treatments for access site complications in patients undergoing TAVR?
This review summarizes the frequency, predictors, and management of access site complications in TAVR, highlighting their impact on patient outcomes and healthcare costs.
Raises TAVR access complication morbidity and costs; leaves open validated prevention strategies.
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common cause of valvular heart disease with heavy disease burden in elderly patients. It is present in almost 7% of patients older than 65. The mortality rate increases significantly once it becomes symptomatic with average life expectancy of around 1-year. Symptoms include angina, syncope, or heart failure. This requires either surgical or transcutaneous replacement. Transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVR) use has increased in recent years from high risk patients to now even including intermediate risk patients. With the increased number of procedures performed, one of the consequences is access site complications. These complications can lead to increased hospitalization, cost, infections, and eventually worse outcomes. In this manuscript, we provide a comprehensive review discussing the consequences, outcomes, frequency, predictors and some possible solutions to these complications set forth in these studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Latham et al. (2018) conducted a review in Aortic stenosis. Transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was evaluated. This comprehensive review discusses the consequences, outcomes, frequency, predictors, and potential solutions for access site complications following transcutaneous aortic valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: