Why the study?
ICDs may deliver unwanted shocks in the last month of life despite guidelines recommending deactivation prior to death, but temporal trends and factors influencing deactivation decisions remained unclear.
Observational (n=72)
Effect estimate: OR 69.30 (95% CI 26.45-181.59)
Although ICD deactivation discussions and rates at the end of life have increased over time, the majority of devices remain active, exposing some patients to unwanted shocks.
BACKGROUND: The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) might give unwanted shocks in the last month of life. Guidelines recommend deactivation of the ICD prior to death. AIMS: The aims of this study were to examine trends in time (2007-2016) in how and when decisions are made about ICD deactivation, and to examine patient- and disease-related factors which may have influenced these decisions. In addition, care and ICD shock frequency in the last month of life of ICD patients are described. METHODS: = 72) hospital were examined. RESULTS: Median age at death was 71 years, and 88% were male. ICD deactivation discussions increased from 6% for patients who had died between 2007 and 2009 to 35% for patients who had died between 2013 and 2016. ICD deactivation rates increased in these periods from 16% to 42%. Presence of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders increased from 9% to 46%. Palliative care consultations increased from 0% to 9%. When the ICD remained active, shocks were reported for 7% of patients in the last month of life. Predictors of ICD deactivation were the occurrence of ICD deactivation discussions after implantation (OR 69.30, CI 26.45-181.59), DNR order (OR 6.83, CI 4.19-11.12), do-not-intubate order (OR 6.41, CI 3.75-10.96), and palliative care consultations (OR 8.67, CI 2.76-27.21). CONCLUSION: ICD deactivation discussions and deactivation rates have increased since 2007. Nevertheless, ICDs remain active in the majority of patients at the end of life, some of whom experience shocks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stoevelaar et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the last phase of life (n=72). ICD deactivation discussions and decisions vs. Trends over time (2007-2009 vs 2013-2016) was evaluated on Predictors of ICD deactivation (occurrence of ICD deactivation discussions after implantation) (OR 69.30, 95% CI 26.45-181.59).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: