Key result
LVEF <35% predicts ~364% higher death or transplant risk in Chagas patients with secondary ICDs.
Why the study?
Data on long-term follow-up of patients with Chagas heart disease receiving a secondary prevention ICD are limited and its benefit is controversial.
Cohort (n=89)
No
Effect estimate: HR 4.64 (LVEF < 35%); HR 3.19 (age ≥ 65 years)
p-value: p=<0.01
In patients with Chagas' cardiomyopathy receiving a secondary prevention ICD, older age (≥65 years) and LVEF < 35% are strong independent predictors of death or heart transplantation.
May aid risk stratification by LVEF and age in Chagas patients with secondary prevention ICDs; leaves open prospective validation before guiding management.
AIMS: Data on long-term follow-up of patients with Chagas' heart disease (ChHD) receiving a secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) are limited and its benefit is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of ChHD patients who received a secondary prevention ICD. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed the outcomes of consecutive ChHD patients referred to our Institution from 2006 to 2014 for a secondary prevention ICD [89 patients; 58 men; mean age 56 ± 11 years; left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), 42 ± 12%]. The primary outcome included a composite of death from any cause or heart transplantation. After a mean follow-up of 59 ± 27 months, the primary outcome occurred in 23 patients (5.3% per year). Multivariate analysis showed that LVEF < 35% [hazard ratio (HR) 4.64; P < 0.01] and age ≥ 65 years (HR 3.19; P < 0.01) were independent predictors of the primary outcome. Using these two risk factors, a risk score was developed, and lower- (no risk factors), intermediate- (one risk factor), and higher-risk (two risk factors) groups were recognized with an annual rate of primary outcome of 1.4%, 7.4%, and 20.4%, respectively. A high burden of appropriate ICD therapies (16% per year) and electrical storms were documented, however, ICD interventions did not impact on the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: Among ChHD patients receiving a secondary prevention ICD, older age (≥65 years) and left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF < 35%) portend a poor outcome and were associated with increased risk of death or heart transplantation. Most patients received appropriate ICD therapies, however, ICD interventions did not impact on the primary outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gali et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Chagas' heart disease and ventricular tachycardia (n=89). Secondary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was evaluated on Composite of death from any cause or heart transplantation (HR 4.64 (LVEF < 35%); HR 3.19 (age ≥ 65 years), p=<0.01). In Chagas' heart disease patients receiving a secondary prevention ICD, LVEF < 35% (HR 4.64; P<0.01) and age ≥ 65 years (HR 3.19; P<0.01) independently predicted death or heart transplantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: