Why the study?
Many patients with AF cannot tolerate anticoagulation due to bleeding, prompting the development of surgical and percutaneous LAA closure devices to prevent embolic cerebrovascular accidents.
This review summarizes the anatomy of the left atrial appendage and the outcomes of surgical and percutaneous closure methods for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who cannot tolerate anticoagulation.
Offers synthesis of LAA closure options for anticoagulation-intolerant NVAF; leaves open optimal strategy selection pending comparative trials.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the United States and the most common cause of embolic cerebrovascular events, with the majority of these thrombi originating in the left atrial appendage. The left atrial appendage (LAA) has separate developmental, ultrastructural, and physiological characteristics from the left atrium. Although LAA anatomy is highly variable, it can be categorized into 4 types: cactus, cauliflower, chicken wing, and windsock. The cauliflower type is associated with higher stroke risk in patients with nonvalvular AF. Although the cornerstone of therapy to prevent embolic strokes from AF has been anticoagulation with thrombin inhibitors, a large group of patients are unable to tolerate anticoagulation due to bleeding. This has led to the development and advancement of multiple surgical and percutaneous LAA closure devices to prevent embolic cerebrovascular accidents without the need for anticoagulation. In this article, we discuss the outcomes of major studies that utilized surgical LAA occlusion and its effectiveness. Furthermore, we summarize nonsurgical methods of LAA closure and future directions regarding LAA closure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babapoor-Farrokhran et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: