Key result
Non-invasive remote monitoring for chronic HF remains difficult to assess without common standards and legislation.
Why the study?
Assessing the effectiveness of diverse remote monitoring technologies in chronic heart failure remains difficult due to lacking common standards, inadequate legislation, and socioeconomic disparities in availability.
Does non-invasive remote monitoring improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does non-invasive remote monitoring improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Non-invasive remote monitoring provides diverse management options for chronic heart failure, but standardized approaches are needed to fully establish its clinical efficacy.
Should not yet change chronic heart failure practice; leaves open efficacy assessment pending standardized trials and legislation.
Remote monitoring of patients, including those with chronic heart failure, has been actively used in recent years. Unlike invasive methods, non invasive methods are not associated with surgical risks and offer a wide range of patient management options such as telemonitoring, virtual visits, emergency department pre triage, in hospital telemedicine, telemedicine rehabilitation, psychological support, etc. Previously, remote monitoring required a multidisciplinary medical team to ensure high efficiency, and attempts to use advanced technology to reduce human involvement were often unsuccessful. However, all electronic and telemedicine technologies in healthcare have been dramatically transformed by the COVID-19 pandemic. There is currently a wide variety of remote monitoring methods and technologies. But it is still impossible to clearly assess their effectiveness due to a lack of common standards, inadequate legislation, and regional, social, and economic differences in the availability of these technologies. However, in 2021, remote monitoring was included in the European Society of Cardiology clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute and chronic heart failure (IIb). This review describes the history of modern remote monitoring methods and the problems they are designed to solve in order to improve outpatient health monitoring for patients with chronic heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Емельянов et al. (2024) conducted a review in Chronic heart failure. Non-invasive remote monitoring was evaluated. Non-invasive remote monitoring provides diverse management options for chronic heart failure, but its effectiveness remains difficult to assess due to a lack of common standards and inadequate legislation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: