Key result
Combined pharmacological and physiotherapeutic prophylaxis is linked to ~42% lower DVT risk after joint and spinal surgeries.
Why the study?
Does combined physiotherapeutic and pharmacological prophylaxis reduce the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing joint replacement and spinal surgeries compared to physiotherapeutic prophylaxis alone?
Cohort (n=195)
No
Does combined physiotherapeutic and pharmacological prophylaxis reduce the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients undergoing joint replacement and spinal surgeries compared to physiotherapeutic prophylaxis alone?
Absolute Event Rate: 7% vs 12%
May support combined prophylaxis; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Introduction: Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) is one of the common and dreaded complication of joint replacements, hip and spine surgeries. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis among these cases is significant in spite of the various prophylactic measure such as physiotherapy and pharmacological measures. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted in our Institute between January 2014 to June 2017. The study included patients who underwent total hip and total knee replacements for various cases and spinal surgeries during the same year. We had a total of 195 patients in the study. Among these, 65 patients were given DVT prophylaxis by physiotherapeutic measure such as foot pump and pneumatic compression device and 130 were given combined physiotherapeutic and pharmacological prophylaxis by giving Low molecular weight heparin postoperatively. Post operatively patients were assessed for DVT both clinically and by Doppler Study Results: A total of 8 patients out of 65 among the physiotherapeutic alone group developed thrombosis [12%]. Among 130 patients who were given prophylaxis by combined measures 9 patients developed thrombosis [07%]. So the results of our study have shown that combined physiotherapeutic and pharmacological measure have an edge over the physiotherapeutic measure alone. Conclusion: Researches which have been done previously have shown that there is no difference in the incidence of DVT among patients treated by other physiotherapeutic and pharmacological measures alone. In our study the result of combined methods was found to be better than physiotherapy measure alone. Hence, the incidence of DVT among the replacement and spine surgeries can be reduced by combined modalities of prophylaxis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
KP et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Joint replacement and spinal surgeries (n=195). Combined physiotherapeutic and pharmacological prophylaxis (LMWH) vs. Physiotherapeutic prophylaxis alone was evaluated on Incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Combined physiotherapeutic and pharmacological prophylaxis resulted in a 7% incidence of deep vein thrombosis compared to 12% with physiotherapeutic measures alone following joint replacement and spinal surgeries.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: