Key result
Analyzing the transaortic pressure gradient shape completely separated HOCM (ratio 0.59) from fixed aortic stenosis (ratio >1.13), with a first-to-second half gradient ratio <0.80 identifying HOCM.
Why the study?
Does the configuration of the left ventricular outflow pressure gradient differentiate hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy from discrete types of aortic stenosis?
Observational (n=62)
Does the configuration of the left ventricular outflow pressure gradient differentiate hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy from discrete types of aortic stenosis?
The ratio of the mean pressure gradient during the first half of ejection to the last half provides a reliable hemodynamic method to completely differentiate dynamic obstruction in HOCM from fixed aortic stenosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gradient shape analysis may differentiate HOCM from fixed AS at catheterization; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Since obstruction to left ventricular (LV) outflow in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyo- pathy (HOCM) is dynamic, whereas that in discrete aortic stenosis is fixed, the shape of the transaortic pressure gradient should be characteristically altered in HOCM and thereby provide a means of differentiating these two disparate types of aortic stenosis. In all 22 HOCM patients, peak arterial pulse always occurred in the initial half of the systolic ejection period, while in 37 of 40 patients with discrete types ofaortic stenosis it appeared in the final half. Peak left ventricular pressure was delayed significantly (P < 0.01) in HOCM compared with fixed aortic stenosis. Furthermore, the interval from onset of ejection to peak left ventricular pressure divided by ejection period was increased in HOCM, 0 59 compared with 0 49 (P < 0.01) in fixed aortic stenosis. The early arterial and late left ventricular pressure pulse peaks in HOCM are related to absence of obstruction to ejection early in systole. Moreover, the ratio of mean pressure gradient during the first half of ejection to that of the last half averaged 0 59 in HOCM. In contrast, this ratio averaged 1 *24 in 23 patients with valvular aortic stenosis, 1 13 in 12 patients with discrete subvalvular stenosis, and 1-85 in 5 patients with supravalvular stenosis. This ratio allowed complete separation of HOCM from fixed aortic stenosis; < 0-80 identified HOCM while greater indicated fixed aortic stenosis. Whether brachial arterial pulse, appropriately adjusted for time, or central aortic pressure pulse was used did not alter these results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mason et al. (1978) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and discrete aortic stenosis (n=62). Transaortic pressure gradient configuration analysis vs. Fixed aortic stenosis was evaluated on Interval from onset of ejection to peak left ventricular pressure divided by ejection period (p=<0.01). Analyzing the transaortic pressure gradient shape completely separated HOCM (ratio 0.59) from fixed aortic stenosis (ratio >1.13), with a first-to-second half gradient ratio <0.80 identifying HOCM.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: