Key result
Chronic PH is linked to higher LV propagation velocity versus healthy controls and diastolic dysfunction.
Why the study?
Does left ventricular velocity of propagation (Vp) differ in patients with chronic pulmonary hypertension compared to normal individuals and those with LV diastolic dysfunction?
Observational (n=135)
No
Does left ventricular velocity of propagation (Vp) differ in patients with chronic pulmonary hypertension compared to normal individuals and those with LV diastolic dysfunction?
Left ventricular velocity of propagation is significantly higher in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension and inversely correlates with pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, suggesting its utility for non-invasive hemodynamic assessment.
May aid non-invasive PH assessment; leaves open prospective validation against invasive hemodynamics.
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) velocity of propagation (Vp) has been shown to be inversely related to the LV relaxation time constant. We sought to examine Vp from a group of chronic pulmonary hypertension (cPH) patients and compare these values to Vp obtained in normal individuals and patients with known LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD). METHODS: Echo-Doppler data and Vp measurements were retrospectively collected from all patients. The studied population was divided into four groups. Group I comprised of 15 patients with normal LV diastole, group II included 27 patients with stage 1 LVDD, group III was made up of 27 patients with stage 2 LVDD, and group IV included 66 patients with cPH. RESULTS: In the cPH population studied, patients had smaller end-diastolic LV cavities with the highest Vp values but their early mitral inflow to Vp ratios were not different from healthy controls. In addition, Vp values and pulmonary wedge capillary pressures were significantly associated in patients with LV dysfunction or pulmonary hypertension (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: LVVp might be a useful non-invasive measurement to be routinely obtained in cPH patients as it probably not only reflects the compressive forces being exerted on the LV, known to increase Vp, but also might be quite useful for the non-invasive assessment of pulmonary capillary wedge pressures in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernández-Suárez et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Chronic pulmonary hypertension and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (n=135). Left ventricular velocity of propagation (Vp) assessment vs. Normal LV diastolic function and LVDD stages 1 and 2 was evaluated on Left ventricular velocity of propagation (Vp) (p=< 0.05). Left ventricular velocity of propagation was significantly higher in patients with chronic pulmonary hypertension compared to healthy controls and patients with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (P < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: