Key result
CRT off-on protocols during CMR demonstrate ~28% feasibility and reveal LVEF improvements resist acute reversal.
Why the study?
While cardiac magnetic resonance is the gold standard for assessing left ventricular function, the feasibility of using it with active cardiac resynchronization therapy remained uncertain.
Is a CRT 'off-on' protocol during CMR feasible and safe for assessing LV function in patients with an MR-conditional CRT defibrillator?
Observational (n=29)
Is a CRT 'off-on' protocol during CMR feasible and safe for assessing LV function in patients with an MR-conditional CRT defibrillator?
A CRT 'off-on' protocol during CMR is safe but technically challenging, with only 28% yielding analyzable data, though it demonstrated that CRT-induced LVEF improvements are not acutely reversed by therapy interruption.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low feasibility limits routine use; supports hypothesis that CRT LVEF gains are not acutely reversible.
Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a standard treatment for patients with heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for assessing left ventricular (LV) function. However, the feasibility of using CMR with active CRT is still uncertain. Purpose To assess the feasibility of a CRT “off‐on” protocol during CMR and measure the acute effects of CRT interruption on LV function. Methods Patients underwent CMR before (pre‐CRT) and 6 months after (post‐CRT) an MR‐conditional CRT defibrillator implantation. The post‐CRT scan included two complete sets of cine images, one with inactive (post‐CRT OFF ) and one with active CRT (post‐CRT ON ), maintaining a continuous connection between device and programmer. Results Out of 29 enrolled patients, 8 (28%) had complete and analyzable post‐CRT data. Unsuccessful procedures were attributed to connection problems between the CRT device and the programmer ( n = 10), poor image quality ( n = 7), and lack of patient cooperation ( n = 4). LV ejection fraction significantly increased between pre‐CRT scan (28.1%) and both post‐CRT OFF (37.9%; p = 0.046) and post‐CRT ON CMR (35.0%; p = 0.037), with a nonstatistically significant trend toward decreased LV volumes. No adverse events or significant changes in device electrical parameters (including battery level) were detected during the post‐CMR scan period. Conclusion A CRT “off‐on” protocol during CMR studies can be safely executed in patients with an MR‐conditional CRT defibrillator. However, technical improvements are needed to facilitate high‐quality scans during active CRT. Favorable changes in LV function induced by CRT remodeling were not acutely reversed with the interruption of electrical therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Basile et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony (n=29). CRT "off-on" protocol during CMR vs. Pre-CRT baseline was evaluated on Complete and analyzable post-CRT CMR data (feasibility). A CRT "off-on" protocol during CMR was feasible in only 28% of patients, but demonstrated that favorable LVEF changes induced by CRT (28.1% to 37.9%, p=0.046) were not acutely reversed by interruption.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: