Self-reported family history of myocardial infarction showed moderate agreement with register data (κ 0.491, sensitivity 57.6%, specificity 89.0%), underestimating prevalence in close relatives.
Cohort (n=25,302)
Yes
How accurate is self-reported family history of myocardial infarction compared to nationwide register data in a population-based cohort?
Self-reported family history of MI moderately agrees with register data but underestimates the prevalence of MI in close relatives, particularly for early-onset disease.
Effect estimate: κ 0.491
Self-reported family history of myocardial infarction (MI) is frequently used to assess cardiovascular risk. However, validation of self-reported family history has often been limited to small samples, and to death-certificates or self-reported medical history as reference. This study investigated the accuracy of self-reported family history of MI in a population-based cohort, using register data as reference. We included 25,302 participants from the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS) with sufficient register coverage. Self-reported family history of MI in parents and siblings was obtained from the SCAPIS questionnaire. Relatives were identified in the Swedish Multi-Generation Register and occurrences of MI were retrieved from the Swedish National Patient Register and Cause of Death Register. Cohen’s κ, sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values for self-reports were calculated using register-derived diagnoses as reference. The mean age of participants was 57.5 years. The overall agreement of self-reported and register-verified family history was moderate. Reporting family history of MI in any parent or sibling yielded a κ of 0.491, a sensitivity of 57.6% and a specificity of 89.0%. The positive and negative predictive values were 73.9 and 79.6%, respectively. The accuracy of reported maternal and paternal MI were similar, however, reports of early-onset disease showed lower overall κ. Male participants consistently reported family history less accurately than females, and participants with a university degree reported family history more accurately than those without a university education. Compared with register data, self-reported family history of MI underestimates the prevalence of, especially early-onset, MI in close relatives.
Wahrenberg et al. (Sat,) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction (n=25,302). Self-reported family history of myocardial infarction vs. Register-derived diagnoses was evaluated on Accuracy of self-reported family history of MI in any parent or sibling (κ 0.491). Self-reported family history of myocardial infarction showed moderate agreement with register data (κ 0.491, sensitivity 57.6%, specificity 89.0%), underestimating prevalence in close relatives.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: