Key result
Lower heart rate linked to higher central pulse pressure, driven by enhanced backward wave pressures.
Why the study?
Lower heart rate associates with increased central pulse pressure, but the relative contribution to forward wave pressure of aortic flow versus re-reflection of backward waves had not been determined.
Cross-Sectional (n=824)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Increases in central pulse pressure at lower heart rates are driven by enhanced backward wave pressures rather than prolonged ejection or flow, an effect that becomes clinically important at older ages.
May link lower heart rate to higher central pulse pressure via backward waves in older adults; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation.
Through both backward (Pb) and forward (Pf) wave effects, a lower heart rate (HR) associates with increased central (PPc), beyond brachial pulse pressure (PP). However, the relative contribution to Pf of aortic flow (Q) versus re-reflection of Pb, has not been determined. Using central pressure, aortic velocity and diameter measurements in the outflow tract (echocardiography), we constructed central pressure waveforms that account for the relative contribution of Q versus re-reflection to Pf. We thus evaluated the mechanisms of HR-PPc relations in a community sample (n=824) and the impact of age thereon. Inverse HR-PPc ( P <0.0001), but not HR-brachial PP ( P =0.064) relations were noted. The slope of HR-PPc relation was increased in older adults ( P <0.005). HR was inversely associated with ventricular filling time, ejection duration, stroke volume, and peak Pf ( P <0.001 to P <0.0001). However, an increased Q and hence pressures generated by the product of aortic characteristic impedance and Q did not account for Pf effects. Age-dependent HR-PPc and Pf relations were both accounted for by enhanced Pb ( P <0.0001) with an increased Pf mediated by increments in wave re-reflection ( P <0.0001). The lack of impact of ejection duration on PPc was explained by an increased time to peak Pb ( P <0.0001). In conclusion, increases in PPc and Pf at a decreased HR are accounted for by an enhanced Pb rather than by a prolonged ejection or filling duration and hence flow (Q). These effects at a young-to-middle age are of little clinical significance, but at an older age, are of clinical importance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mthembu et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Community sample (n=824). Heart rate was evaluated on Central pulse pressure (PPc) and backward wave pressures (Pb) (p=<0.0001). Lower heart rate is inversely associated with central pulse pressure (P<0.0001), an effect driven by enhanced backward wave pressures rather than increased aortic flow, particularly in older adults.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: