Why the study?
Does surgical CryoMaze followed by catheter ablation improve arrhythmia-free survival compared to surgical CryoMaze alone in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery?
Population
260 patients with persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation and structural heart disease…
Comparison
Surgical CryoMaze followed by radiofrequency… vs Surgical CryoMaze alone.
Design
Other, Randomized to either surgical CryoMaze alone or surgical CryoMaze…
Follow-up
24 months
Key result
Sequential hybrid surgical CryoMaze followed by catheter ablation is being investigated in the SurHyb randomized controlled trial to determine its efficacy compared to surgical CryoMaze alone.
Authors
Loading...
Remains unproven for persistent AF; SurHyb RCT will deliver first randomized evidence.
RCT (n=260)
Single-blind
1:1 ratio via computer system
Yes
Does surgical CryoMaze followed by catheter ablation improve arrhythmia-free survival compared to surgical CryoMaze alone in patients with persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery?
This study protocol outlines the first randomized trial to compare surgical CryoMaze alone with a staged hybrid approach (surgical CryoMaze followed by catheter ablation) for persistent atrial fibrillation.
Eisenberger et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Persistent or long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (n=260). Sequential hybrid surgical CryoMaze followed by catheter ablation vs. Surgical CryoMaze alone was evaluated on Arrhythmia-free survival without class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs at 24 months. Sequential hybrid surgical CryoMaze followed by catheter ablation is being investigated in the SurHyb randomized controlled trial to determine its efficacy compared to surgical CryoMaze alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: