Key result
MultiPoint Pacing with SyncAV achieves the narrowest QRSd via dynamic AVDs.
Why the study?
The individual and combined synchronization contributions of dynamic atrioventricular delays and multisite LV pacing had not been evaluated across a comprehensive spectrum of pacing configurations.
Does MultiPoint Pacing combined with dynamic atrioventricular delays improve acute electrical synchrony (QRS duration) in CRT-indicated patients with LBBB and intact AV conduction?
Does MultiPoint Pacing combined with dynamic atrioventricular delays improve acute electrical synchrony (QRS duration) in CRT-indicated patients with LBBB and intact AV conduction?
p-value: p=< 0.0001
MultiPoint Pacing combined with dynamic atrioventricular delays acutely improves electrical synchronization by narrowing QRS duration more effectively than conventional pacing strategies in CRT patients.
May support CRT optimization for acute QRS narrowing; hypothesis-generating for randomized outcome trials.
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response relies on 2 factors: when and where to pace. These factors may be enhanced by dynamic atrioventricular delays (AVDs) (eg, SyncAV CRT, Abbott Cardiovascular, Abbott Park, IL) and multisite left ventricular (LV) pacing (eg, MultiPoint Pacing [MPP], Abbott). Their individual and combined synchronization contributions have not been evaluated across a comprehensive spectrum of pacing configurations. The objective is to distinguish the acute electrical synchrony achieved by static vs dynamic AVDs, single-site vs multisite LV pacing, and with vs without right ventricular (RV) pacing. Methods: CRT-indicated patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and intact atrioventricular (AV) conduction (PR < 250 ms) were enrolled and evaluated during implant. Acute changes in 12-lead electrocardiographic (ECG) QRS duration (QRSd) were evaluated during intrinsic conduction, biventricular pacing (BiV), biventricular MPP, LV-only single-site pacing (LVSS), and LV-only MPP (LVMPP). CRT modes were evaluated with static AVDs and optimized SyncAV AVDs. Results: < 0.0001, each corresponding pair). Conclusions: MPP combined with SyncAV achieved the narrowest QRSd, in the overall population and in the most patients, by delivering ventricular pacing from all available sites (RV + LV1 + LV2) while timed with dynamic AVDs. Clinical Registration Number: NCT03567096.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thibault et al. (2024) studied CRT-indicated patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and intact atrioventricular (AV) conduction. MultiPoint Pacing (MPP) with dynamic AVDs (SyncAV) vs. Static AVDs and single-site LV pacing was evaluated on Acute changes in 12-lead ECG QRS duration (QRSd) (p=< 0.0001). MultiPoint Pacing combined with SyncAV achieved the narrowest QRS duration by delivering ventricular pacing from all available sites timed with dynamic AVDs (P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: