Key result
Proposed decision tree integrates minimally invasive revascularization to guide Heart Team decisions in complex CAD.
Why the study?
Heart Teams face challenges incorporating new minimally invasive revascularization strategies for increasingly complex and frail patients, which current guidelines do not fully address.
This review proposes a novel decision tree to help Heart Teams incorporate minimally invasive and hybrid revascularization strategies into patient care.
May aid Heart Team selection of minimally invasive strategies in complex CAD; leaves open prospective validation before adoption.
Recent years have seen an important shift in the target population for myocardial revascularization. Patients are increasingly presenting with more complex coronary artery disease (CAD), but also with multiple comorbidities and frailty. At the same time, minimally invasive strategies such as Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (MIDCAB) and Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI) have been developed, which might be more appealing for this group of patients. As a result, the landscape of options for myocardial revascularization is evolving while adequate use of all resources is required to ensure optimal patient care. Heart Teams are confronted with the challenge of incorporating the new minimally invasive strategies into the decision process, yet current guidelines do not fully address this challenge. In this review, the current evidence regarding outcomes, indications, benefits, and risks of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB), MIDCAB, PCI, and hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) are discussed. Based on this evidence and on experiences from Heart Team discussions, a new decision tree is proposed that incorporates recent advances in minimally invasive revascularization strategies, thereby optimizing adequate delivery of care for each individual patient's needs. Introducing all important considerations in a logical way, this tool facilitates the decision-making process and might ensure appropriate use of resources and optimal care for individual patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eynde et al. (2020) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease (CAD). Minimally invasive and hybrid myocardial revascularization was evaluated. A proposed decision tree incorporates minimally invasive revascularization strategies (OPCAB, MIDCAB, PCI, and HCR) to facilitate Heart Team decision-making for patients with complex CAD.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: