Key result
Snorkel stenting during TAVR preserves immediate coronary perfusion in ~75% of high-risk patients.
Why the study?
Coronary artery occlusion is a potentially fatal complication following TAVR in patients with high-risk anatomical features, and snorkel/chimney stenting has emerged as a feasible bailout or planned strategy to maintain coronary perfusion.
Does snorkel/chimney stenting maintain coronary perfusion and survival in high-risk patients undergoing TAVR?
Case Report (n=4)
Does snorkel/chimney stenting maintain coronary perfusion and survival in high-risk patients undergoing TAVR?
Snorkel stenting is a feasible bailout or planned strategy to maintain coronary perfusion during TAVR in high-risk patients, though long-term survival remains limited by underlying comorbidities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Snorkel stenting may preserve perfusion in select high-risk TAVR cases; case report leaves open durability and broader applicability.
Coronary artery occlusion is a rare but potentially fatal complication following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), particularly in patients with high-risk anatomical features such as low coronary takeoff or shallow sinuses of Valsalva. Snorkel/chimney stenting has emerged as a feasible bailout or planned strategy to maintain coronary perfusion in these cases. This case series describes the procedural approach, technical challenges, and clinical outcomes of three patients who underwent snorkel stenting of the coronary arteries following TAVR as well as one patient with concerns for coronary obstruction before TAVR. Four high-risk patients underwent TAVR with planned or emergent snorkel stenting to prevent or manage coronary obstruction. Outcomes were assessed based on procedural success, coronary patency, and survival. Snorkel stenting was technically successful in three cases, preserving immediate coronary perfusion, while a fourth case had preparations for snorkel stenting but was not needed as the TAVR bioprosthesis did not occlude the coronary artery. Three patients survived for approximately 1–2 years post-intervention before succumbing to non-cardiac or unrelated complications and expired. Challenges included optimal stent positioning to minimize leaflet interaction and the potential for thrombotic complications. This case series highlights both the feasibility and limitations of snorkel stenting as a coronary protection strategy post-TAVR. While short-term technical success was achieved, long-term survival remained limited in this high-risk population. Further research is needed to optimize patient selection, procedural strategies, and long-term management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
To et al. (2025) conducted a case report in High risk for coronary artery occlusion during TAVR (n=4). Snorkel/chimney stenting was evaluated on Procedural success, coronary patency, and survival. Snorkel stenting during TAVR was technically successful in 3 of 4 high-risk patients, preserving immediate coronary perfusion, though patients succumbed to unrelated complications at 1-2 years.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: