PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1999European Heart Journal335 citations

The circadian pattern of the development of ventricular fibrillation in patients with Brugada syndrome

View Full Paper
KMKiyotaka Matsuo

Key Result

Ventricular fibrillation in Brugada syndrome patients occurred significantly more frequently at night than during the day (93.3% vs 6.7%, P<0.001) and during sleep than while awake.

Key Points

  • To identify the circadian pattern and timing distribution of ventricular fibrillation episodes in patients with Brugada syndrome.
  • Monitored 12 consecutive male patients with Brugada syndrome (mean age 46±14 years) who had implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) devices.
  • Analyzed ICD data logs over a mean follow-up of 777±535 days, categorizing ventricular fibrillation episodes into four 6-hour daily intervals and sleep versus wake states.
  • Ventricular fibrillation occurred 30 times across 6 of the 12 patients, with significantly higher frequency at night (1800 h to 0600 h) than during the day (93.3% [28/30] vs 6.7% [2/30], P<0.001).
  • Episodes were far more common during sleep than while awake (86.7% [26/30] vs 13.3% [4/30], P<0.001), peaking between midnight and 0600 h during sleep (76.9% [20/26] vs 23.1% [6/26], P<0.01).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=12)

Structured PICO

What is the circadian pattern of ventricular fibrillation development in patients with Brugada syndrome?

P
Population
12 consecutive male patients with Brugada syndrome (mean age 46+/-14 years) who underwent implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator
O
Outcome
Distribution of the time of ventricular fibrillation detection (classified into four 6-hour time periods of the day)hard clinical

Ventricular fibrillation in Brugada syndrome occurs predominantly at night and during sleep, suggesting a role for increased nocturnal vagal activity and sympathetic withdrawal.

Main Result

Absolute Event Rate: 93.3% vs 6.7%

p-value: p=<0.001

Abstract

AIMS: Brugada syndrome is considered to be a distinctive subgroup of idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Identification of the circadian pattern of ventricular fibrillation would contribute to the elucidation of its underlying pathophysiology, but this pattern remains unknown in patients with Brugada syndrome. METHODS: and Results A total of 12 consecutive Brugada syndrome patients (46+/-14 years, all male) who underwent implantation of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator were studied. The distribution of the time of ventricular fibrillation detection was examined and classified into four 6-hour time periods of the day. The mean follow-up period following implantation was 777+/-535 days. In six out of the 12 patients, ventricular fibrillation occurred during follow-up. The data logs revealed that ventricular fibrillation was detected 30 times (range, 3-9). Ventricular fibrillation was observed more frequently at night ( 1800 h to 0600 h) than in the day (0600 h to 1800 h) (93.3% 28/30 vs 6.7%2/30, P<0.001), and during sleep than while awake (86.7% 26/30 vs 13.3%4/30, P<0.001). Ventricular fibrillation occurred most frequently between midnight and 0600 h in patients with ventricular fibrillation episodes during sleep (76.9% 20/26 vs 23.1%6/26, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that increased nocturnal vagal activity and withdrawal sympathetic activity may play an important role in the arrhythmogenesis of the Brugada syndrome.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kiyotaka Matsuo (1999) conducted an observational in Brugada syndrome (n=12). Observation of circadian pattern vs. Daytime or awake periods was evaluated on Distribution of the time of ventricular fibrillation detection (night vs day) (p=<0.001). Ventricular fibrillation in Brugada syndrome patients occurred significantly more frequently at night than during the day (93.3% vs 6.7%, P<0.001) and during sleep than while awake.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0e7744a03ab94435044239https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.1998.1332
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper