Key result
Symmetrical pacing of engineered heart tissue improves contractile force over asymmetrical or no pacing.
Why the study?
Existing large animal models to predict CRT response and investigate molecular mechanisms of dyssynchrony and CRT are technically demanding and laborious, prompting the need for a humanized in vitro model.
Does asymmetrical pacing compared to symmetrical pacing affect contractile force and molecular markers in human engineered heart tissue?
Does asymmetrical pacing compared to symmetrical pacing affect contractile force and molecular markers in human engineered heart tissue?
A novel humanized in vitro model using engineered heart tissue successfully recapitulates the contractile impairment and molecular changes associated with electrical dyssynchrony, providing a tool to study CRT mechanisms.
BACKGROUND: One third of heart failure patients exhibit dyssynchronized electromechanical activity of the heart (evidenced by a broad QRS-complex). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in the form of biventricular pacing improves cardiac output and clinical outcome of responding patients. Technically demanding and laborious large animal models have been developed to better predict responders of CRT and to investigate molecular mechanisms of dyssynchrony and CRT. The aim of this study was to establish a first humanized in vitro model of dyssynchrony and CRT. METHODS: Cardiomyocytes were differentiated from human induced pluripotent stem cells and cast into a fibrin matrix to produce engineered heart tissue (EHT). EHTs were either field stimulated in their entirety (symmetrically) or excited locally from one end (asymmetrically) or they were allowed to beat spontaneously. To investigate acute and long-term functional effects, spontaneously beating human EHTs (0.5-0.8 Hz) were divided into a non-paced control group, a symmetrically and an asymmetrically paced group, each stimulated at 1 Hz. Symmetrical pacing was clearly superior to asymmetrical pacing or no pacing regarding contractile force both acutely and even more pronounced after weeks of continuous stimulation. Contractile dysfunction that can be evoked by an increased afterload was aggravated in the asymmetrically paced group. Consistent with reports from paced dogs, p38MAPK and CaMKII-abundance was higher under asymmetrical than under symmetrical pacing while pAKT was considerably lower. CONCLUSIONS: This model allows for long-term pacing experiments mimicking electrical dyssynchrony vs. synchrony in vitro. Combined with force measurement and afterload stimulus manipulation, it provides a robust new tool to gain insight into the biology of dyssynchrony and CRT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stenzig et al. (2021) studied Heart failure / dyssynchrony (in vitro model). Symmetrical pacing vs. Asymmetrical pacing or no pacing was evaluated on Contractile force. Symmetrical pacing of human engineered heart tissue was superior to asymmetrical pacing or no pacing regarding contractile force, both acutely and after weeks of continuous stimulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: