Key result
Spironolactone fails to change myocardial extracellular volume but slows expansion in HFpEF.
Why the study?
Spironolactone may offer prognostic benefit in selected patients with HFpEF, but its myocardial tissue effects remained to be assessed.
Does spironolactone improve myocardial extracellular volume fraction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
RCT (n=55)
1:1
Does spironolactone improve myocardial extracellular volume fraction in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
Absolute Event Rate: -1% vs 0.8%
While spironolactone did not significantly change overall extracellular volume in HFpEF, it decreased the rate of extracellular expansion and reduced left ventricular mass, suggesting a direct tissue effect on myocardial fibrosis.
No ECV reduction with spironolactone in HFpEF; challenges antifibrotic expectations and leaves open longer-term effects.
Background Spironolactone may have prognostic benefit in selected patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. This study assessed the myocardial tissue effects of spironolactone in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Methods and Results A 1:1 randomized controlled study of 6 months of spironolactone versus control in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The primary outcome was change in myocardial extracellular volume fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance as a surrogate of diffuse fibrosis. Of 55 randomized patients, 40 (20 women; age, 75.2±5.9 years) completed follow‐up (19 treatment, 21 control). A significant change in extracellular volume over the study period was not seen (treatment, 28.7±3.7% versus 27.7±3.4% [ P =0.14]; controls, 27.6±3.4% versus 28.3±4.4% [ P =0.14]); however, the rate of extracellular volume expansion was decreased by spironolactone (−1.0±2.4% versus 0.8±2.2%). Indexed left ventricular mass decreased with treatment (104.4±26.6 versus 94.0±20.6 g/m 2 ; P =0.001) but not in controls (101.4±29.4 versus 104.0±32.8 g/m 2 ; P =0.111). Extracellular mass decreased by 13.8% (15.1±4.8 versus 13.0±3.4 g/m 2 ; P =0.003), and cellular mass decreased by 8.3% (37.6±10.0 versus 34.3±7.9 g/m 2 ; P =0.001) with spironolactone, but was static in controls. Conclusions Spironolactone did not lead to significant change in extracellular volume. However, spironolactone did decrease rate of extracellular expansion, with a decrease in the mass of both cellular and extracellular myocardial compartments. These data point to the mechanism of action of spironolactone in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, including a direct tissue effect with a reduction in rate of myocardial fibrosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McDiarmid et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n=55). spironolactone vs. control was evaluated on change in myocardial extracellular volume fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Spironolactone did not significantly change myocardial extracellular volume fraction over 6 months, but decreased the rate of extracellular volume expansion (-1.0% vs 0.8%) in HFpEF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: