Key result
A dose-adjusted, blood-level monitored antiarrhythmic drug regimen resulted in a 6% one-year mortality among survivors of prehospital cardiac arrest, comparing favorably to historical controls.
Why the study?
Does a dose-adjusted, blood-level monitored antiarrhythmic drug regimen reduce mortality and recurrent cardiac arrest in survivors of prehospital cardiac arrest?
Population
16 patients resuscitated from prehospital cardiac arrest
Comparison
Dose-adjusted, membrane-active antiarrhythmic… vs Historical cohort of survivors of prehospital…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
average 13.25 months
Authors
Loading...
May support monitored antiarrhythmic regimens in arrest survivors; leaves open randomized confirmation of benefit.
Cohort (n=16)
Does a dose-adjusted, blood-level monitored antiarrhythmic drug regimen reduce mortality and recurrent cardiac arrest in survivors of prehospital cardiac arrest?
A blood-level monitored antiarrhythmic drug regimen may reduce mortality and recurrent cardiac arrest in prehospital cardiac arrest survivors, even if it fails to suppress asymptomatic complex ventricular arrhythmias.
Robert J. Myerburg (1977) conducted a cohort in Survivors of prehospital cardiac arrest (n=16). Dose-adjusted, membrane-active antiarrhythmic drug regimen vs. Historical control (patients not receiving a controlled antiarrhythmic program) was evaluated on One-year mortality. A dose-adjusted, blood-level monitored antiarrhythmic drug regimen resulted in a 6% one-year mortality among survivors of prehospital cardiac arrest, comparing favorably to historical controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: