Key result
Serum PICP concentrations showed a significant time-dependent change that correlated with LV indices, whereas ICTP concentrations were a poor indicator for LV indices after AMI.
Why the study?
Do time-dependent changes in serum PICP and ICTP concentrations correlate with left ventricular remodeling indices in patients with acute myocardial infarction after successful reperfusion?
Observational (n=13)
Do time-dependent changes in serum PICP and ICTP concentrations correlate with left ventricular remodeling indices in patients with acute myocardial infarction after successful reperfusion?
Serum PICP, but not ICTP, correlates with left ventricular volume indices after acute myocardial infarction, suggesting its potential utility in evaluating post-infarction healing and remodeling.
PICP may aid post-AMI remodeling assessment; leaves open its value for risk stratification or therapy guidance.
To test the hypothesis that in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), changes in the concentrations of the serum carboxy-terminal peptide of type I procollagen (PICP) and the carboxy-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) reflect extracellular matrix reformation and degradation, respectively, in the infarct healing processes, we measured these serum concentrations by RIA and compared their values with left ventricular (LV) indices obtained by left ventriculography. We studied 13 consecutive patients with their first AMI who underwent successful reperfusion. Blood samples were taken the day of admission and on days 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 14. LV volume indices were determined at 1 month after AMI, when LV remodeling was almost completed. The serum concentrations of both PICP and ICTP changed in a time-dependent manner. The average serum PICP concentration was lower than 1 SD below the mean control values on days 2 and 3 and increased thereafter, returning to the lower end of the control range at day 14. The area under the curve (AUC) for PICP was significantly correlated with the LV end systolic (ES) and end diastolic (ED) volume indices and LV ejection fraction for the first 14 days after AMI. The serum PICP on days 5–14 was inversely correlated or tended to be correlated with the LVES and LVED volume indices. The average serum ICTP concentrations on admission were within the control range, began to increase on day 2, and reached maximal concentrations on day 5, remaining at a plateau concentration until day 14. Although the AUC of ICTP for 14 days, the ICTP concentrations on days 1 and 14, and the minimal and maximal concentrations were significantly correlated with creatine kinase (CK) release and the period from AMI onset to the peak CK time, the concentrations were not significantly correlated with any LV indices except for the concentration on day 4, which was weakly correlated with the LVES volume index. The serum concentrations of PICP showed a significant time-dependent change that correlated with LV indices, indicating that PICP may provide additional information for evaluating the healing process because it affects LV remodeling after AMI. Although the serum concentration of ICTP changed in association with CK release, the ICTP concentration was found to be a poor indicator for LV indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murakami et al. (1998) conducted an observational in acute myocardial infarction (n=13). Measurement of serum PICP and ICTP concentrations was evaluated on Correlation of serum PICP and ICTP concentrations with left ventricular (LV) volume indices. Serum PICP concentrations showed a significant time-dependent change that correlated with LV indices, whereas ICTP concentrations were a poor indicator for LV indices after AMI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: