Key result
CardioMEMS linked to ~28% fewer heart failure hospitalizations in cardio-oncology patients.
Why the study?
Cancer patients and survivors have an increased risk of heart failure and hospitalization, yet utilization of wireless pulmonary artery pressure sensing devices like CardioMEMS remains limited in this population.
Does CardioMEMS-guided heart failure management reduce heart failure hospitalizations and improve pulmonary artery pressures in cardio-oncology patients?
Cohort (n=28)
No
Does CardioMEMS-guided heart failure management reduce heart failure hospitalizations and improve pulmonary artery pressures in cardio-oncology patients?
CardioMEMS-guided management is safe and associated with reduced heart failure hospitalizations and improved pulmonary artery pressures in high-risk cardio-oncology patients.
Reduced HFH rates with CardioMEMS in this cohort; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
AIMS: Cancer patients and survivors are at increased risk of developing heart failure (HF) and heart failure hospitalization (HFH). Yet, the utilization of wireless pulmonary artery pressure sensing devices (PAPSD), like CardioMEMS, in this group is limited. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to explore the utilization of CardioMEMS in managing HF among oncology patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study reviewing consecutive patients implanted with the CardioMEMS device between November 11, 2015, and February 21, 2023. We analyzed the device's impact on pulmonary artery pressures and HFH using statistical methods including Cox regression models and correlation studies between NT-proBNP levels and hemodynamic parameters. RESULTS: The study included 28 patients, with hypertension (78%) and hyperlipidemia (78%) as prevalent comorbidities. Most patients had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (64%). Post-implantation, we observed a reduction in HFH and improvements in pulmonary artery pressures. Cox regression identified prior HFH and elevated pulmonary artery systolic (PAS) and diastolic pressures (PAD) as risk factors for repeat HFH (HR: 1.24, 1.04, 1.07, respectively). Biomarker analysis showed a moderate positive correlation between NT-proBNP and PAD, indicating that higher levels are associated with increased hospital admissions. The device was safe with no sensor failures reported. CONCLUSIONS: CardioMEMS shows potential in improving HF management in cancer patients, reducing HFH and enhancing pulmonary artery pressure profiles. These preliminary results advocate for further, larger-scale prospective studies to confirm the benefits and integrate CardioMEMS into cardio-oncology care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ali et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Heart failure in cardio-oncology patients (n=28). CardioMEMS vs. Pre-implantation period was evaluated on Heart failure hospitalization event rate per person-year. CardioMEMS implantation in cardio-oncology patients reduced heart failure hospitalization event rates from 1.22 to 0.88 per person-year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: