Key result
Breath-hold dual-echo in- and out-of-phase MRI at 3.0 T strongly correlated with proton MR spectroscopy for quantifying myocardial fat content (r = 0.78; P < 0.05).
Why the study?
Does breath-hold dual-echo MRI accurately quantify myocardial fat content compared to proton MR spectroscopy in humans?
Observational (n=46)
Does breath-hold dual-echo MRI accurately quantify myocardial fat content compared to proton MR spectroscopy in humans?
Effect estimate: r = 0.78
Absolute Event Rate: 1.04% vs 0.7%
p-value: p=< 0.05
Dual-echo MRI at 3.0 T provides a rapid and accurate method for quantifying myocardial fat content in vivo, correlating strongly with traditional MR spectroscopy.
Supports breath-hold dual-echo MRI as potential alternative for myocardial fat quantification; leaves open larger validation studies.
Proton MR spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) has been used for in vivo quantification of intracellular triglycerides within the sarcolemma. The purpose of this study was to assess whether breath-hold dual-echo in- and out-of-phase MRI at 3.0 T can quantify the fat content of the myocardium. Biases, including T(1), T*(2), and noise, that confound the calculation of the fat fraction were carefully corrected. Thirty-four of 46 participants had both MRI and MRS data. The fat fractions from MRI showed a strong correlation with fat fractions from MRS (r = 0.78; P < 0.05). The mean myocardial fat fraction for all 34 subjects was 0.7 +/- 0.5% (range: 0.11-3%) assessed with MRS and 1.04 +/- 0.4% (range: 0.32-2.44%) assessed with in- and out-of-phase MRI (P < 0.05). Scanning times were less than 15 sec for Dixon imaging, plus an additional minute for the acquisition used for T*(2) calculation, and 15-20 min for MRS. The average postprocessing time for MRS was 3 min and 5 min for MRI including T*(2) measurement. We conclude that the dual echo method provides a rapid means to detect and quantifying myocardial fat content in vivo. Correction/adjustment for field inhomogeneity using three or more echoes seems crucial for the dual echo approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Myocardial fat (n=46). Breath-hold dual-echo in- and out-of-phase MRI at 3.0 T vs. Proton MR spectroscopy ((1)H-MRS) was evaluated on Myocardial fat fraction (r = 0.78, p=< 0.05). Breath-hold dual-echo in- and out-of-phase MRI at 3.0 T strongly correlated with proton MR spectroscopy for quantifying myocardial fat content (r = 0.78; P < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: