Key result
Dual-echo Dixon MRI was investigated for quantifying myocardial fat content compared to 1H MRS, but no results were reported in the abstract.
Why the study?
Can dual-echo Dixon MRI quantify the fatty content of the myocardium compared to 1H MRS?
Can dual-echo Dixon MRI quantify the fatty content of the myocardium compared to 1H MRS?
Dual-echo Dixon MRI is being evaluated as a feasible tool to quantify myocardial fat and its spatial distribution, potentially overcoming the single-voxel limitations of 1H MRS.
Dual-echo Dixon MRI feasibility for myocardial fat quantification remains untested; leaves open its comparison to 1H MRS.
The concept of fat contained within the myocardium, has recently received attention because of its potential role in diabetic myocardial disease, obesity, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected individuals [ 1 ]. Measurements of myocardial triglycerides in humans have been accessed using proton MR spectroscopy (1H MRS) [ 2 ]. 1H MRS provides a precise and reproducible tool for in-vivo quantification of intracellular triglycerides within the sarcolemma. However, the spatial distribution of the fat deposition cannot be accessed by 1H MRS due to its single voxel characteristics. We studied whether the dual-echo Dixon MRI could quantify the fatty content of the myocardium. The fraction of fat was also quantified directly with 1H MRS as an independent method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2009) studied Myocardial fat deposition. Dual-echo Dixon MRI vs. Proton MR spectroscopy (1H MRS) was evaluated on Myocardial fat fraction. Dual-echo Dixon MRI was investigated for quantifying myocardial fat content compared to 1H MRS, but no results were reported in the abstract.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: