Key result
Echo screening for LVSD fails to reduce HF hospitalization or death in pacemaker patients.
Why the study?
Individuals with pacemakers have an increased risk of LVSD, but whether screening for and optimizing its medical management improves clinical outcomes is unknown.
Does echocardiography screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction reduce heart failure hospitalization or death in individuals with pacemakers?
RCT (n=1,201)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does echocardiography screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction reduce heart failure hospitalization or death in individuals with pacemakers?
Routine echocardiography screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with pacemakers identifies dysfunction frequently but does not significantly reduce the composite of heart failure hospitalization or death compared to usual care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support routine echocardiographic screening in pacemaker patients; challenges assumptions that early LVSD detection improves hard outcomes.
Individuals with pacemakers are at increased risk of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). Whether screening for and optimizing the medical management of LVSD in these individuals can improve clinical outcomes is unknown. In the present study, in a multicenter controlled trial (OPT-PACE), we randomized 1,201 patients (717 men) with a pacemaker to echocardiography screening or usual care. In the screening arm, LVSD was detected in 201 of 600 (34%) patients, who then received management in either primary care or a specialist heart failure (HF) and devices clinic. The primary outcome of the trial was the difference in a composite of time to first HF hospitalization or death. Over 31 months (interquartile range = 30-40 months), the primary outcome occurred in 106 of 600 (18%) patients receiving echocardiography screening, which was not significantly different compared with the occurrence of the primary outcome in 115 of 601 (19%) patients receiving the usual care (hazard ratio = 0.89; 95% confidence interval = 0.69, 1.17). In a prespecified, nonrandomized, exploratory analysis, patients with LVSD managed by the specialist clinic experienced the primary outcome event less frequently than those managed in primary care. The results of this trial indicate that echocardiography screening commonly identifies LVSD in individuals with pacemakers but alone does not alter outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01819662 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Paton et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Pacemaker implanted for bradycardia (n=1,201). Echocardiography screening vs. Usual care (no screening) was evaluated on Composite of time to first heart failure hospitalization or death (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.69-1.17). Echocardiographic screening for left ventricular systolic dysfunction in individuals with pacemakers did not significantly reduce the composite of heart failure hospitalization or death compared to usual care (HR 0.89).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: