Key result
Recent HFpEF trials fail to improve outcomes and survival, likely due to syndrome heterogeneity.
The review highlights that the heterogeneity of HFpEF is a primary reason for the failure of recent clinical trials to improve outcomes and survival.
HFpEF trial failures caution against uniform therapies; leaves open phenotype-targeted trial designs.
Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of hospitalization among older adults and the prevalence is growing with the aging populations in the Western countries. Epidemiologic reports suggest that approximately 50% of patients who have signs or symptoms of HF have preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. This HF type predominantly affects women and the elderly with other co-morbidities, such as diabetes, hypertension, and overt volume status. Most of the current treatment strategies are based on morbidity benefits such as quality of life and reduction of clinical HF symptoms. Treatment of patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction displayed disappointing results from several large randomized controlled trials. The heterogeneity of HF with preserved ejection fraction, understood as complex syndrome, seems to be one of the primary reasons. Here, we present an overview of the current management strategies with available evidence and new therapeutic approach from drugs currently in clinical trials, which target diastolic dysfunction, chronotropic incompetence, and risk factor management. We provide an outline and interpretation of recent clinical trials that failed to improve outcome and survival in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Becher et al. (2015) conducted a review in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Treatment strategies for HFpEF was evaluated. Recent clinical trials for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction have failed to improve outcomes and survival, likely due to the heterogeneity of the syndrome.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: