Key result
Matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor PG-116800 fails to reduce LV end-diastolic volume index changes versus placebo.
Why the study?
PG-116800 demonstrated significant antiremodeling effects in animal models of MI and ischemic heart failure, but its ability to reduce LV remodeling after MI in humans was undetermined.
Does the selective matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor PG-116800 reduce left ventricular remodeling in patients with first ST-segment elevation MI and LVEF 15-40%?
RCT (n=253)
double-blind
randomized
Yes
Does the selective matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor PG-116800 reduce left ventricular remodeling in patients with first ST-segment elevation MI and LVEF 15-40%?
The selective matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor PG-116800 did not reduce left ventricular remodeling or improve clinical outcomes when administered for 90 days after a first STEMI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support MMP inhibition to limit post-MI remodeling; extends preclinical data to randomized clinical evidence.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitor, PG-116800, reduced left ventricular (LV) remodeling after myocardial infarction (MI). BACKGROUND: PG-116800 is an oral MMP inhibitor with significant antiremodeling effects in animal models of MI and ischemic heart failure. METHODS: In an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 253 patients with first ST-segment elevation MI and ejection fraction between 15% and 40% were enrolled 48+/- 24 h after MI and treated with placebo or PG-116800 for 90 days. Major efficacy end points were changes in LV volumes as determined by serial echocardiography, and clinical and safety outcomes were also collected. RESULTS: In total, 203 patients (80%) completed 90 days of treatment and had evaluable baseline and 90-day echocardiograms. The proportion of patients with anterior MI (78% vs. 81%) and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (90% vs. 91%) along with baseline LV ejection fraction (35.5% vs. 36.8%) did not differ between PG-116800-treated and placebo-treated patients. There was no difference in the change in LV end-diastolic volume index from days 0 to 90 with PG-116800 versus placebo (5.09 +/- 1.45 ml/m(2) vs. 5.48 +/- 1.41 ml/m2, p = 0.42). Changes in LV diastolic volume, LV systolic volume, LV ejection fraction, sphericity index, plus rates of death or reinfarction were not significantly improved with PG-116800. PG-116800 was well tolerated; however, there was increased incidence of arthralgia and joint stiffness without significant increase in overall musculoskeletal adverse events (21% vs. 15%, p = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition with PG-116800 failed to reduce LV remodeling or improve clinical outcomes after MI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hudson et al. (2006) conducted an RCT in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with reduced ejection fraction (n=253). PG-116800 vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index from days 0 to 90 (p=0.42). Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition with PG-116800 did not significantly reduce the change in left ventricular end-diastolic volume index compared to placebo (5.09 vs 5.48 ml/m2; P=0.42).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: